Read, annotate, and analyze the majority opinion from Earls v Bd of Ed, and answer the following questions:
Did the facts that seemed so important to the Court in Vernonia (lack of privacy among athletes, safety concerns relating to athletes and drug use, and the degree of the drug problem among athletes) seem significant to the majority in its decision in the Earls case? Is this surprising?
Why did the Court rule the way it did? Do you agree? Explain.
Did the facts that seemed so important to the Court in Vernonia (lack of privacy among athletes, safety concerns relating to athletes and drug use, and the degree of the drug problem among athletes) seem significant to the majority in its decision in the Earls case? Is this surprising?
Why did the Court rule the way it did? Do you agree? Explain.
No comments:
Post a Comment